Risk governance & organisation
Set a clear risk appetite, structure committee governance and the lines of defence, and equip the organisation to steer risks with control.
A robust governance framework drives risk appetite, decision quality and supervisory trust. We formalise the roles, processes and bodies that make it possible to decide quickly and well.
From defining the risk appetite statement to the target organisation (roles, tools, data), we make your frameworks documented, auditable and owned by your teams.
What we do
- 01 Risk appetite framework and risk appetite statement (RAS)
- 02 Committee governance and the three lines of defence
- 03 Target operating model: organisation, roles, tools and data
- 04 Risk mapping and steering frameworks
- 05 Governance of ICAAP and ORSA frameworks
- 06 Remediation plans following inspections or recommendations
- Design, governance and coordination of an ICAAP framework through to final validation — Société Générale
- Risk appetite statement and risk mapping for a financial conglomerate (banking, insurance, asset management) — Groupe BPCE
- Target operating model of the ALM risk management department (governance, organisation, tools, data) — Société Générale
- Strengthening of the governance and organisation of a market-risk department — Société Générale
Frequently asked questions
What is a risk appetite statement (RAS)?
The risk appetite statement formalises the level and nature of risks an institution is willing to take to meet its objectives. Broken down into indicators and limits, it structures decision-making and the dialogue with the supervisor.
What are the three lines of defence?
A model for organising risk responsibilities: the first line (the business) takes and manages risks, the second (risk and compliance) frames and controls them, and the third (internal audit) provides independent assurance.
The other areas of expertise
A finance or risk challenge?
Let's discuss your governance, model or compliance topics.