Regulatory compliance & best standards
Anticipate and embed the regulatory flow — Basel, FRTB, ICAAP/ILAAP, ORSA, BCBS 239, SREP — and prepare the supervisory dialogue.
Internal requirements, the regulatory framework and best-practice benchmarks form a continuous flow of standards to anticipate and embed. We run the gap analysis and end-to-end compliance.
From preparing supervisory exercises to the dialogue with the supervisor (JST/ECB) and remediation plans, we formalise clear, defensible target policies.
What we do
- 01 Basel and its finalisation, FRTB
- 02 ICAAP, ILAAP and ORSA frameworks
- 03 Regulatory data quality (BCBS 239)
- 04 SREP preparation and supervisory dialogue (JST/ECB)
- 05 Gap analysis and formalisation of target policies
- 06 Remediation plans following inspections
- Design, governance and coordination of an ICAAP framework — dialogue with the Joint Supervisory Team (ECB) — Société Générale
- Reinforcement of the supplementary supervision of a financial conglomerate (ICAAP, ORSA, FiCoD) — Groupe BPCE
- Monitoring of FRTB streams (internal model and standardised approach) — Natixis
- BCBS 239 remediation plan following general-inspection findings — Société Générale
Frequently asked questions
What is the SREP?
The SREP (Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process) is the review through which the supervisor assesses an institution’s risks, governance, capital and liquidity. It draws notably on the ICAAP and ILAAP and may lead to additional requirements.
What is the difference between ICAAP and ILAAP?
ICAAP assesses capital adequacy against incurred risks; ILAAP does the same for liquidity. Both frameworks feed the SREP supervisory review.
The other areas of expertise
A finance or risk challenge?
Let's discuss your governance, model or compliance topics.